Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy

Cross-cultural communication as a tool for forming a positive image of Ukraine in the world

Vasyl Shynkaruk, Oleksandra Shynkaruk
Download article
Abstract

Modern geopolitical challenges and the need for Ukraine's active integration into the global information space have determined the importance of cross-cultural communication in shaping a positive national image. The purpose of the study was to clarify the role of cross-cultural communication in forming a positive image of Ukraine in the international arena and to identify effective mechanisms for its application. It was demonstrated that cross-cultural communication enabled Ukraine to establish mutual understanding with different nations, thereby fostering trust, support, and solidarity in the global arena. It was emphasised that the issue of forming a positive image of Ukraine worldwide is strategically significant in the context of its integration into the European and global community. The study showed that through language, art, science, education, diplomacy, and other forms of communication, Ukraine can convey its values, history, traditions, and contemporary achievements to the international community, as well as overcome stereotypes and build trust. Furthermore, cross-cultural interaction allowed the Ukrainian people to demonstrate their identity, resilience, and spiritual strength, which was particularly important in the context of the struggle for independence and international subjectivity. It was established that cross-cultural communication was not only a means of cultural exchange but also a powerful instrument of strategic communication that enabled Ukraine to shape a positive image, strengthen international ties, and consolidate its position on the global stage. The study substantiated that the development of cross-cultural competence contributed to improving the quality of foreign policy, diplomatic, media, and cultural interaction. Through intercultural dialogue and the promotion of Ukrainian identity, art, language, and values, the state can form an attractive, open, and progressive image and positively influence international partnership, tourism, investment attractiveness, and cultural diplomacy. These elements constituted key components of Ukraine's sustainable development strategy in the global environment. The results of the study may be applied in further theoretical research on cultural diplomacy

Keywords

state image; public diplomacy; media; globalisation; international communication

Suggested citation
Shynkaruk, V., & Shynkaruk, O. (2026). Cross-cultural communication as a tool for forming a positive image of Ukraine in the world. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 14(1), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/1.2026.115
References
  1. Atamanchuk, Z.A. (2022). The impact of cross-cultural communications in international tourism on the diffusion of innovations between countries. Economics and Management Organization, 1(45), 59-66. doi: 10.31558/2307-2318.2022.1.6.
  2. Batsevych, F.S. (2007). Dictionary of intercultural communication terms. Kyiv: Dovira.
  3. Beňo, M. (2021). The advantages and disadvantages of e-working: An examination using an Aldine analysis. Emerging Science Journal, 5, 11-20. doi: 10.28991/esj-2021-SPER-02.
  4. Berry, J., Purtinga, A., Sigall, M., & Dasen, P. (2007). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Kharkiv: Humanitarian Centre.
  5. Borysko, N.F. (2018). Problems of intercultural training of future teachers and teachers of foreign languages. Foreign Languages, 1, 9-20.
  6. Derevyanko, O. (2025). Ukrainian PR has entered a development trajectory where there is no one to take an example from. Retrieved from https://mmr.ua/show/olena-derev-yanko-ukrayinskyj-piar-vyjshov-na-taku-trayektoriyu-rozvytku-de-nema-z-kogo-braty-pryklad.
  7. Hall, E.T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.
  8. Hansen, W.L. (1990). The international trade commission and the politics of protectionism. American Political Science Review, 84(1), 21-46.
  9. Harhaun, Ya. (2023). Ukrainian diaspora: Influence on the creation of the global Ukrainian space. Antiquities of Lukomorie, 3, 75-81. doi: 10.33782/2708-4116.2023.3.214.
  10. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  11. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  12. Khortiuk, O.V. (2010). Correlation of the concepts “business reputation”, “goodwill”, “image”, “prestige”, “reputation”. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 4, 211-214.
  13. Kryvobok, K., Kinas, I., & Deli, V. (2024). Key aspects of cross-cultural communication in event management. Мodeling the Development of the Economic Systems, 1, 242-249. doi: 10.31891/mdes/2024-11-36.
  14. Kvasha, O.S., & Syniakova, A.V. (2019). Ukraine and EU: Problems and prospects of integration in modern terms. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, 23(1), 112-117.
  15. Lashkina, M., Khrystokin, H., & Vasylchenko, V. (2023). Сross-cultural communications in the digital age: Relevance for the activities of journalists. Image, 2(42), 86-96. doi: 10.21272/Obraz.2023.2(42)-86-96.
  16. Makar, V. (2024). Diaspora as an instrument of public diplomacy of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Precarpathian University. Series: Political Science, 18, 219-231. doi: 10.32782/2312-1815/2024-18-21.
  17. Morhulets, O., Nyshenko, O., & Shevchenko, O. (2023). Cross-cultural communications in tourism: Problems and solutions. Economy and Society, 57, 1-7. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-57-60.
  18. Nye, J.S. (2023). Soft power and great-power competition: Shifting sands in the balance of power between the United States and China. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  19. Nye, J.S. (2024). Old and new lessons from the Ukraine war. Retrieved from https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/ukraine-war-eight-lessons-for-military-tactics-grand-strategy-sanctions-by-joseph-s-nye-2024-06.
  20. Patryak, O.S. (2021). Cross-cultural communications in the process of doing business. Information and Society, 10-12.
  21. Prudyus, L.V. (2016). Іmplementation of the cross-cultural management conception in civil service. Investments: Practice and Experience, 18, 108-111.
  22. Pryshlyak, О.Yu. (2019). Intercultural competence of future professionals in the context of leading theories of intercultural interaction. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 5(2), 40-42. doi: 10.31339/2413-3329-2019-2(10)/2-40-42.
  23. Rogers, E.M., Hart, W.B., & Miike, Y. (2002). Edward T. Hall and the history of intercultural communication: The United States and Japan. Keio Communication Review, 24, 3-26.
  24. Rozumna, O.P. (2016). Cultural diplomacy of Ukraine: Status, problems, prospects. Kyiv: National Institute for Strategic Studies.
  25. Rybak, D. (2020). Cultural diplomacy as a tool for rebranding Ukraine. May Studies: History, International Relations, 5, 114-117.
  26. Samoilenko, N.B. (2014). Intercultural competence of future specialists in the humanitarian field. Scientific Review, 2(1), 1-10.
  27. Samovar, L.A., Porter, R.E., & McDaniel, E.R. (2009). Communication between cultures (7th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.
  28. Savenko, O.V. (2022). Brand and image of the country: Socio-cultural projection of the correlation of concepts. Issues of Cultural Studies, 40, 294-303. doi: 10.31866/2410-1311.40.2022.269386.
  29. Singh, R. (2002). Contemporary American politics and society: Issues and controversies. London: Sage.
  30. Snow, N., & Cull, N.J. (2020). Routledge handbook of public diplomacy (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  31. Solodka, A.K. (2016). Theoretical and methodic principles of cross-cultural interaction of pedagogical process participants in higher education. (Doctoral thesis, Volodymyr Dahl East-Ukrainian National University, Kyiv, Ukraine).
  32. Taylor, O.L. (1990). Cross-cultural communication: An essential dimension of effective education. Chevy Chase: The Mid-Atlantic Equity Center.
  33. Trager, G., & Hall, E. (1954). Culture as communication: A model and analysis. New York, 320.
  34. Van Ham, P. (2002). Branding territory: Inside the wonderful worlds of PR and IR theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(2), 249-269. doi: 10.1177/03058298020310020101.
  35. Walle, A.H. (2022b). Entrepreneurship and culture: The new social paradigm. New York: Routledge.
  36. Walle, A.H. (2022а). Geert Hofstede and entrepreneurial dimensions. In Entrepreneurship and culture: The new social paradigm (pp. 36-49). New York: Routledge.
  37. Watanabe, Y. (2016). The pivot shift of Japan’s public diplomacy. In N. Chitty, L. Ji, G.D. Rawnsley & C. Hayden (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of soft power (pp. 390-404). London: Routledge.