Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy

Terminological differentiation of the concepts “intercultural”, “polycultural”, “multicultural”, and “cross-cultural” in the context of forming cross-cultural competence

Olena Turitsyna
Download article
Abstract

The relevance of this research was determined by the growing influence of globalisation processes that increasingly affect all spheres of social life. The modern world is characterised by intensive migration flows and the expansion of international cooperation in education, economics, politics, and culture, which necessitate effective interaction among representatives of different cultures and value systems. In this context, the ability to establish constructive communication, to understand cultural codes, and to avoid intercultural barriers had become an essential component of the professional competence of contemporary specialists. The purpose of this article was to provide a detailed terminological distinction between the concepts intercultural, polycultural, multicultural, and cross-cultural in the context of forming cross-cultural competence, and to reveal the interrelations and specific features in scholarly discourse. The study employed methods of theoretical analysis of academic literature, comparative analysis of key terms, generalisation, systematisation, and interpretation of research findings. The results demonstrated that, despite certain semantic similarities, each term carried its own conceptual meaning and highlighted different aspects of cultural interaction. Specifically, multicultural communication emphasised the coexistence and diversity of cultures within a single society; intercultural communication focused on dialogue, mutual understanding, and tolerance between representatives of different cultural groups; cross-cultural communication concerned the active interaction between individuals from significantly different cultural systems, addressing differences and overcoming barriers; whereas polycultural communication reflected the idea of harmonious cultural interpenetration while preserving each culture’s unique identity. The findings of the research can be applied to design effective educational programmes and training courses aimed at developing cross-cultural competence among future professionals in the field of international relations

Keywords

terminology; communication; cultural interaction; globalisation; cultural differences; social integration

Suggested citation
Turitsyna, O. (2026). Terminological differentiation of the concepts “intercultural”, “polycultural”, “multicultural”, and “cross-cultural” in the context of forming cross-cultural competence. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 14(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/1.2026.40
References
  1. Baker, W. (2024). Intercultural communication. ELT Journal, 78(2), 212-215. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccad040.
  2. Banks, J.A. (2016). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.
  3. Batsevych, F.S. (2007). Dictionary of terms in intercultural communication. Kyiv: Dovira.
  4. Berry, J.W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x.
  5. Borysko, N.F. (2018). Problems of intercultural training of future teachers and instructors of foreign languages. Scientific and Methodological Journal “Foreign Languages”, 1(93), 9-20.
  6. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  7. Cambridge dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org.
  8. Chaika, O. (2024). Intercultural communication in multicultural education: Strategies, challenges, and opportunities. International Journal of Philology, 28(1), 116-123. doi: 10.31548/philolog15(1).2024.012.
  9. Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W.J. (2005). Foundations of intercultural communication. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  10. Chen, Q., Mao, Y., & Morrison, A.M. (2023). Study on the influence of cultural communication on the development of the visitor economy. Sustainability, 15(3), article number 1842. doi: 10.3390/su15031842.
  11. Chirkov, V. (2024). Statistical positivism, psychoanalysis, and the theory of sociocultural models: A review of three approaches to acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 101, article number 102009. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102009.  
  12. Global arena. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://globalarena.com/difference-multicultural-cross-cultural-intercultural-communication.
  13. Gudykunst, W.B., Kim, Y.Y., & Gudykunst, W. (1997). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  14. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  15. Horlach, V.V. (2020). Cross-cultural and intercultural communication: Correlation of concepts. (Doctoral dissertation, Zaporizhzhia National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine).
  16. Huang, M. (2024). Cross-cultural communication in the digital era: Insights from social media interactions. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 54(1), 23-29. doi: 10.54254/2753-7048/54/20241566.
  17. Kovalynska, I. (2016). The concepts of “poly-culturalism” and “multiculturalism” in scholarly discourse. Educological Discourse, 1(13), 65-78.
  18. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com.
  19. Nadeem, M.U., & Zabrodskaja, A. (2023). A comprehensive model of intercultural communication for international students living in culturally diverse societies: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Communication, 8, article number 1332001. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1332001.
  20. Paquienseguy, F., & Guo, Q. (2025). Douyin and the digital spread of intangible cultural heritage: Transforming cultural dissemination in the short videos age. Emerging Media, 3(2), 343-366. doi: 10.1177/27523543251344976.
  21. Rosenthal, L., & Levy, S.R. (2010). The colorblind, multicultural, and polycultural ideological approaches to improving intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 215-246. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01022.x.
  22. Solodka, A.K. (2016). Theoretical-methodological principles of cross-cultural interaction of participants in the pedagogical process of higher educational institutions. (Doctoral dissertation, Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, Kyiv, Ukraine).
  23. Sousa, C., Goncalves, G., & Santos, J. (2019). Intercultural contact as a predictor of cultural intelligence. Universitas Psychologica, 18(2), 1-12. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-2.icpc.
  24. Tkachuk, A. (2023). Communication strategies for effective intercultural understanding in the context of cultural diversity. Theoretical and Methodical Problems of Children and Youth Education, 27(2), 212-223. doi: 10.32405/2308-3778-2023-27-2-212-223.
  25. Valenzuela, M.A., & Bernardo, A.B.I. (2023). The potential of fostering connections: Insights into polycultural organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 16(3), 378-397. doi: 10.1017/iop.2023.23.
  26. Wilczewski, M., & Alon, I. (2023). Language and communication in international students’ adaptation: A bibliometric and content analysis review. Higher Education, 85, 1235-1256. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00888-8.