Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy

The psychological aspect of youth's perceptions of love and marriage in conditions of socio-psychological uncertainty

Olena Kokhanova, Olena Shevtsova
Download article
Abstract

In the complex and unstable realities of Ukrainian society in recent years, significant changes have been observed in marriage and family processes, and therefore the problem of the psychological foundations and characteristics of the development of contemporary youth's perceptions of love and marriage was relevant and required thorough research. The aim of the study was to identify the psychological characteristics of contemporary Ukrainian youth's perceptions of love and marriage in conditions of socio-psychological uncertainty. The main research methods were a written survey using Google Forms and quantitative and qualitative analysis methods. The results showed that for modern youth in conditions of socio-psychological uncertainty, love and romance are worldview values of present and future life. As for the values of starting a family and getting married, they turned out to be irrelevant for modern youth. The young people surveyed had highly differentiated ideas about love and romance, emphasising such fundamental psychological characteristics of love as the highest human feeling: depth, duration, stability, strength, awareness, unconditional acceptance of a partner, responsibility, devotion, trust, care, etc. In their ideas about love, modern young people noted its emotional and moral-ethical components, as well as emphasising the joint activity aspect of partner relationships in love. At the same time, modern youth showed duality in their understanding and attitude towards love, demonstrating, on the one hand, a rational approach to feelings of love and, on the other hand, an irrational approach. In the perceptions of young people, a long period of partnership should contribute to the well-being of a future marriage. It was also found that modern youth were tolerant of the diversity of manifestations of love in society, as they valued love as an existential need for the life of any person. The results obtained in the study regarding youth's perceptions of love and marriage can be used in counselling and psychotherapeutic practice by family psychologists and other professionals in the helping professions

Keywords

infatuation; romantic feelings; partner relationships; marital relationships; conditions of uncertainty

Suggested citation
Kokhanova, O., & Shevtsova, O. (2026). The psychological aspect of youth's perceptions of love and marriage in conditions of socio-psychological uncertainty. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 14(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/1.2026.85
References
  1. American Psychological Association (APA). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/.
  2. American Sociological Association's Code of Ethics. (2018, June). Retrieved from https://www.asanet.org/wp-content/uploads/asa_code_of_ethics-june2018a.pdf.
  3. Batsylyeva, O., Astakhov, V., & Puz, I. (2019). Research on psychological aspects of modern youth’s readiness for marriage. Psychological Journal, 5(10), 64-83. doi: 10.31108/1.2019.5.10.5.
  4. Breakwell, G.M. (2021). Mistrust. London: Sage Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781529770070.
  5. Carter, J. (2022). Love: Why romantic love matters in uncertain times. In M.H. Jacobsen (Ed.), Emotions in culture and everyday life. Conceptual, theoretical and empirical explorations (pp. 13-29). London: Routledge.
  6. Cassepp‑Borges, V., Gonzales, J.E., Frazier, A., & Ferrer, E. (2023). Love and relationship satisfaction as a function of romantic relationship stages. Trends in Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s43076-023-00333-4.
  7. Denysovets, T., Denysovets, I., Pyvovar, N., & Kvak, O. (2022). Research of youth values for marriage and family life. Pedagogical Sciences, 5(1), 22-27. doi: 10.33989/2524-2474.2022.79.264515.
  8. Derbyshire, K., Thai, S., Midgley, C., & Lockwood, P. (2023). Love under lockdown: How changes in time with partner impacted stress and relationship outcomes during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(9), 2918-2945. doi: 10.1177/02654075231162599.
  9. Family Code of Ukraine No. 2947-III. (2025, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14#Text.
  10. Guetto, R., Vignoli, D., & Bazzani, G. (2021). Marriage and cohabitation under uncertainty: The role of narratives of the future during the covid-19 pandemic. European Societies, 23(S1), 674-688. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1833359.
  11. Hogg, M.A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 69-126. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8.
  12. Hull, K.E., Meier, A., & Ortyl, T. (2010). The changing landscape of love and marriage. Contexts, 9(2), 32-37. doi: 10.1525/ctx.2010.9.2.32.
  13. Kowal, M., et al. (2024). Love as a commitment device. Human Nature, 35, 430-450. doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09482-6.
  14. Kurova, A.V. (2021). Uncertainty as a socio-psychological problem of personality. Habitus, 32, 198-202.
  15. Lukšík, I., & Šrol, J. (2022). Young people’s individual representations of love – validation of a new scale. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 254-260. doi: 10.24425/ppb.2022.143371.
  16. Machin, A. (2022). Why we love: The new science behind our closest relationships. New York: Pegasus Books.
  17. Magdysyuk, L., Fedorenko, R., & Magdysyuk, D. (2024). Psychological analysis of the modern youth readiness for married life. European Humanities Studies: State and Society, 1(1), 125-139. doi: 10.38014/ehs-ss.2024.1.09.
  18. Matysiak, A., & Vignoli, D. (2024). Family life courses, uncertain futures, and the changing world of work: State-of-the-art and prospects. European Journal of Population, 40, article number 19. doi: 10.1007/s10680-024-09701-x.
  19. Mosol, N.O. (2023). Psychology of love: Theoretical and applied aspects of research. In Psychological patterns of social processes and personality development in modern society (pp. 107-124). Riga: Izdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing”. doi: 10.30525/978-9934-26-326-2-7.
  20. Sassler, S., & Lichter, D.T. (2020). Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union-formation patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 35-61. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12617.
  21. Shumchuk, B.O. (2024). The correlation between the concepts of marriage and love in the works of philosophers from the Middle Ages to modernism. Culturological Almanac, 1, 259-266. doi: 10.31392/cult.alm.2024.1.32.
  22. Sonkaya, Z.I., & Öcal, N.Ü. (2024). Young people’s attitudes toward marriage, gender roles, and related factors. BMC Public Health, 24, article number 3347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20904-z.
  23. Tsilmak, O.M., & Lefterov, V.O. (2020). Psychology of family and marriage: Tables, diagrams, comments. Kyiv: Lira-K.
  24. van Wijk, D.C., de Valk, H.A.G., & Liefbroer, A.C. (2021). Temporary employment and family formation: An income or insecurity effect? European Sociological Review, 37(4), 641-658. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcab007.
  25. Yang, F., & Dalsky, D. (2025). Applying an equivalent indigenous concept model to understand love in mandarin Chinese (爱) and Ukrainian (кохаю). International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 108, article number 102237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102237.
  26. Yoo, G., & Joo, S. (2022). Love for a marriage story: The association between love and marital satisfaction in middle adulthood. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31, 1570-1581. doi: 10.1007/s10826-021-02055-6.
  27. Zick, A., & Sandal-Önal, E. (2023). Uncertainty in conflicts between societal groups – a social psychological view. Center for Uncertainty Studies. Working Papers, 4, 1-30. doi: 10.4119/unibi/2979155.