Prokhorchuk, O.
(2023).
Application of artificial intelligence in teaching disciplines of the humanities cycle.
Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy,
11(1),
79-84.
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog14(1).2023.79-84
The article analyzes the literature on approaches to the use of the AI (Artificial Intelligence) service "ChatGPT", ethical, philosophical and technical aspects. The analyzed sources made it possible to identify general features of the practical application of this service when working with students. Possible ways of using AI in the teaching of disciplines of the humanitarian cycle in institutions of higher education are shown, in particular, on the example of the discipline "Teaching technologies of professional disciplines" of the specialty "Professional education". A trend has been revealed regarding the use of AI (Artificial Intelligence) service "ChatGPT" by students. In the process of empirical research, the author proposed to carry out a preliminary assessment of the texts written by the student, to find errors and suggest the correctness of written statements, for example, regarding the writing of term papers, and also suggested that students generate lists of current literature on selected topics, which significantly updated and refreshed the selection of materials from the academic discipline. Among the AI application methods tested on humanities students, the following were highlighted: problem-developmental, heuristic, partial-research, project method, etc. The conducted research showed that more than 80 % of students noted that after using the given ways of using ChatGPT in educational activities, their motivation to learn the educational material increased significantly, and the use of AI brings some "futurism" to the educational process
artificial intelligence, disciplines of humanitarian cycle, training of humanitarians, educational process
1. The Fourth Industrial Revolution [Electronic resource] — Access mode: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Четверта_промыслова_рев олюция (access date: 03/17/2023). — Title from the screen.
2. Tlili A., Shehata B., Adarkwah M. A., Bozkurt A., Hickey D., Huang R., Agyemang B. What if the devil is my ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education [Electronic resource] / A. Tlili, B. Shehata, M. A. Adarkwah, A. Bozkurt, D. Hickey, R. Huang, B. Agyemang // Smart Learning Environments Tlili et al. Smart Learning Environments, 2023. Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023- 00237-x (accessed 03/17/2023). — Title from the screen.
3. Boden I. Margaret A. Artificial intelligence. Series: Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed) / I. Boden, A. Margaret Q335.A7857 San Diego, California USA. 1996. 376 p.
4. ChatGPT in Ukraine: a nightmare for reviewers [Electronic resource] — Access mode: https://www.bibliotekar.ukr/2023/02/chatgpt.html (access date: 03/17/2023). — Name from the screen.
5. Baidoo-Anu D., Ansah L. O. Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. [Electronic resource] - Access mode: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4337484. (date of application: 17.03.2023). — Title from the screen.
6. Rudolph J., Tan S. ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? / J. Rudolph, S. Tan // Journal of Applied Learning. 2023 — Vol.6 no.1 [Electronic resource] — Access mode: https://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/article/view/689/539.
7. Mhlanga, D. Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT/ D. Mhlanga // Towards Lifelong Learning. — 2023. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4354422.
8. So, what if ChatGPT wrote it? // International Journal of Information Management 71. [Electronic resource] — Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 (access date: 03/17/2023)