Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy

Age differences in the motivational potential for self-realisation among gifted young people

Myroslava Sadova
Download article
Abstract

The study analysed age differences in the motivational potential for self-realisation among gifted young people. The sample consisted of respondents with a high level of giftedness who need targeted psychological support and stimulation of learning motivation, motivation to overcome difficulties and set goals. Motivational potential was considered as a resource for the development and realisation of abilities in various spheres of life. The aim of the study was to empirically identify and analyse age differences in the motivational potential for self-realisation among gifted young people. To achieve this goal, five psychodiagnostic methods were used: “Resources” by N. Vodopyanova, “Coping strategies” by D. Amirkhan, “Motivation for success and fear of failure” by A. Rean, the author's questionnaire “Learning motivation”, and “SAT” by E. Shostrom. The results of the empirical study were presented in a table showing age differences according to the criteria of F. Fisher and T. Student, mean values and standard deviations, as well as an interpretation of the obtained indicators. It has been established that older school-age boys and girls had a higher level of motivational potential for self-realisation than adolescents. The older group was more characterised by such motivational tendencies as ideas about human nature, self-respect, behavioural flexibility, value orientations, time orientation, orientation towards professional realisation, academic success, motivation to avoid failure, creativity, cognitive needs and synergy. In adolescence, other motivational orientations dominate: motivation for prestige, social significance, external negative motivation, need for support, sensitivity, avoidance of problems, social support, lack of clear motivation, self-criticism, and motivation to achieve success. The practical significance of the results obtained lies in identifying age-related psychological barriers and obstacles that affect the self-realisation of gifted individuals, as well as in the possibility of using the data to develop programmes for counselling, therapy and training

Keywords

age range; differentiation; mean value; standard deviation; criteria of F. Fisher and T. Student

Suggested citation
Sadova, M. (2025). Age differences in the motivational potential for self-realisation among gifted young people. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 13(4), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/4.2025.64
References
  1. Abu-Hamour, B., & Al-Hmouz, H. (2013). Study of gifted high, moderate, and low achievers in their personal characteristics and attitudes toward school and teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 28(3), 5-15.
  2. American Sociological Association’s Code of Ethics. (2018, June). Retrieved from https://surl.li/ikkbvd.
  3. Androsovych, K.A., Tkachenko, L.I., Iljina, H.V., Yakymova, I.O., & Shulha, V.M. (2021). Social adaptation of a gifted person: From childhood to adolescence. Kyiv: Institute for Gifted Children of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine.
  4. Barbier, K., Donche, V., & Verschueren, K. (2019). Academic (under)achievement of intellectually gifted students in the transition between primary and secondary education: An individual learner perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article number 2533. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02533.
  5. Briddick, H.S., & Briddick, W.C. (2024). Who owns their story: Career construction with gifted and talented students. Gifted Education International, 40(3), 312-327. doi: 10.1177/02614294241268036.
  6. Burns, E.C., & Martin, A.J. (2021). Motivational issues in gifted education: Understanding the role of students’ attribution and control beliefs, self-worth protection and growth orientation. In S.R. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 339-357). Singapore: Springer.
  7. Cash, T.N., & Lin, T.J. (2021). Psychological well-being of intellectually and academically gifted students in self-contained and pull-out gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(3), 188-207. doi: 10.1177/00169862211032987.
  8. Cholankeril, R., Xiang, E., & Badr, H. (2023). Gender differences in coping and psychological adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), article number 993. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020993.
  9. Clinkenbeard, P.R. (2012). Motivation and gifted students: Implications of theory and research. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 622-630. doi: 10.1002/pits.21628.
  10. Ecker-Lyster, M., Coleman-Tempel, L., Gregersen, S., & Snyder, J. (2021). A sociological examination of parenting practices and gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 44(4), 194-202.
  11. Eremenko, Y.V. (2019). Self-realisation of gifted students in modern Ukraine: Key factors and risks. (Doctoral dissertation, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine).
  12. Fan, W., & Williams, C. (2018). The mediating role of student motivation in the linking of perceived school climate and achievement in reading and mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 3, article number 50. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00050.
  13. Fiedler, E.D. (1999). Gifted children: The promise of potential/the problems of potential. In V.L. Schwean & D.H. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of psychosocial characteristics of exceptional children (pp. 401-441). Boston: Springer.
  14. González-Cabrera, J., Tourón, J., Ortega-Barón, J., Montiel, I., & Machimbarrena, J.M. (2022). Are gifted students more victimized than nongifted students? A comparison in prevalence and relation to psychological variables in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 43(1), 90-109. doi: 10.1177/02724316211058065.
  15. Jurišević, M., Krnjajić, Z., & Šimon, J. (2024). Gifted students’ academic motivation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Croatia, Serbia, and Slovenia. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(3), 296-331. doi: 10.1177/01623532241258720.
  16. Laszczyk, J. (2023). Guiding the development of gifted students-dilemmas and some solutions. International Journal of Pedagogy, Innovation and New Technologies, 10(2), 18-23. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0054.2785.
  17. Laujin, S. (2021). Psychotherapist, psychologist, neuropsychologist in Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://sandralaujin.com/gifted-child?lang=en.
  18. McGregor, M., Jung, J.Y., & Evans, P. (2025). Motivational profiles of gifted students in science. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 45(2), 215-236. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2025.2464866.
  19. Novak, A.M., Lewis, K.D., & Weber, C.L. (2020). Guiding principles in developing equity-driven professional learning for educators of gifted children. Gifted Child Today, 43(3), 169-183. doi: 10.1177/1076217520915743.
  20. Olton-Weber, S., Hess, R., & Ritchotte, J.A. (2020). Reducing levels of perfectionism in gifted and talented youth through a mindfulness intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(4), 319-330. doi: 10.1177/0016986220953392.
  21. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Retrieved from https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2021_RyanDeciVansteenkisteSoenens_BuildingAScience_Manuscript.pdf.
  22. Sadova, M. (2024). Study of motivation components and types of the potential of self-realization of gifted youth. Bratislava: Pan-European University.
  23. Sadova, M.A. (2021). Identifying students with different types of talent: Academic, intellectual, creative, leadership. Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Ternopil National University. Series: Psychology, 32(71(2)), 14-20. doi: 10.32838/2709-3093/2021.2/03.
  24. Siegle, D., & Mcсoach, D.B. (2018). Underachievement and the gifted child. In S.I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 559-573). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  25. Stoeger, H., & Zeidner, M. (2019). Self-regulated learning in gifted, talented, and high-achieving learners. High Ability Studies, 30(1-2), 1-8. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2019.1601326.
  26. Stryzhak, Yu., & Grynova, M. (2022). Formation of self-regulatory competence of future teachers of foreign languages in the process of professional training. Pedagogical Sciences, 5(1), 48-53. doi: 10.33989/2524-2474.2022.79.264538.
  27. Subotnik, R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F.C. (2020). The talent development megamodel: A domain-specific conceptual framework based on the psychology of high performance. In R.J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 425-442). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_24.
  28. Tiwen, H. (2023). Historical and pedagogical aspect of the development of the academic talent of students in Abroad theory and practice. Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies, 9(1), 228-241. doi: 10.31470/2415-3729-2023-17-228-241.
  29. Winsor, D.L., & Mueller, C.E. (2020). Depression, suicide, and the gifted student: A primer for the school psychologist. Psychology in the Schools, 57(10), 1627-1639. doi: 10.1002/pits.22416.