The dynamics of values and vulnerability of modern democracy against the backdrop of globalisation and localisation processes

Valentyna Kultenko, Alina Suprun
Abstract

The relevance of this work was determined by the acute problem of value-based attitudes towards the world in modern conditions, articulated in the concepts of post-truth, the destruction of grand narratives of the past, and widespread fatigue and disappointment. This has led to the devaluation of traditional values and an axiological crisis. The aim of the work was to reveal the vulnerable aspects of democracy and their impact on the dynamics of values, globalisation and localisation processes of the present day. To achieve this aim, a set of methods was used, in particular, comparative, analytical, empirical, and causal. The research was conducted in the context of a sociocultural approach, based on the principles of systematicity and development. The research found that the instability of the world, permanent crises, and global challenges that characterise the modern era have led to significant sociocultural and political changes, which have become a serious test and threat to the democratic world. Leaders of political processes have increasingly appealed to the emotional and irrational sphere, defining it as the value base for political action. This has resulted in the global spread of manipulative practices, populist slogans, aggressive demagoguery, fear politics, and growing authoritarian tendencies in the socio-political sphere. Democracy, being limited in its ability to counter such practices, had at its disposal mainly means of dialogue, agreements, and deals that required prior consent, responsibility of the parties, and the willingness of all actors to comply with the terms of the agreements. This demonstrated the vulnerability of democracy, within which fertile ground was created for radicals and political criminals who viewed the stability of democratic values as weaknesses of democracy and used them to seize power, achieve immoral goals, and localise the population in closed communities through intimidation, violence, and political speculation. To counter this, the local unification of communities based on markers of patriotic nationalism seemed to be the most acceptable strategy, taking into account humanity's need for security and, at the same time, looking to the future. The results achieved can be used in educational and social work as separate topics in courses on ethics, philosophy, political science, etc.

Keywords

authoritarianism; radicalism; populism; political manipulation; identity; nationalism; patriotism

Suggested citation
Kultenko, V., & Suprun, S. (2025). The dynamics of values and vulnerability of modern democracy against the backdrop of globalisation and localisation processes. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 13(4), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/4.2025.128
References
  1. Barnard, F.M. (2003). Herder on nationality, humanity, and history. Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  2. Bieber, F. (2022). Global nationalism in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nationalities Papers, 50(1), 13-25. doi: 10.1017/nps.2020.35.
  3. Bruckner, P. (2010). The tyranny of guilt: An essay on western masochism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  4. Carey, H.F., & Mitchell, S.M. (2020). A hybrid approach to understanding peacebuilding. In H.F. Carey (Ed.), Peacebuilding paradigms: The impact of theoretical diversity on implementing sustainable peace (pp. 324-346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Dukh, Y. (2025). Why are the Poles (again) hating Ukrainians? The Volhynia tragedy, the deportation of Ukrainians, the Home Army and the UPA. Retrieved from https://surl.li/xwwmey.
  6. Etzioni, A. (2019). Reclaiming patriotism. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  7. Ganuthula, V.R.R., & Balaraman, K.K. (2025). The triad of modern democracies: Money, identity, and information in shaping power and legitimacy. arXivdoi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.09124.
  8. Habermas, Y. (2005). Citizenship and national identity. In W. van Steenbergen (Ed.), Conditions of citizenship: Collected articles (pp. 49-70). Kyiv: Ukrainian Centre for Spiritual Culture.
  9. Havel, V. (1985). The power of the powerless. London: Routledge.
  10. Horban, O., Kuprii, T., Tur, M., & Sagan, G. (2019). Difficult questions of historical memory in paradigm of culture dialogue. Bialystok: Białoruskie Towarzystwo Historyczne.
  11. Hrytsak, Y. (2025). Yaroslav Hrytsak on war scenarios, generational change and nationalism. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSMCos2dwy4.
  12. Kartashova, S.S., Shchetinina, O.K., & Kaneva, T.V. (2019). Approaches to assessing the cost of human life: World experience and recommendations for use in Ukraine. Demography and Social Economy, 1(35), 182-195. doi: 10.15407/dse2019.01.182.
  13. Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  14. Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.
  15. Kultenko, V., Morska, N., Fesenko, G., Poperechna, G., Polishchuk, R., & Kulbida, S. (2022). The natural human rights within the postmodern society: A philosophical socio-cultural analysis. Postmodern Openings, 13(1), 186-197. doi: 10.18662/po/13.1/391.
  16. Lomaka, V. (2024). Legal values as the basis of the legal culture of society. Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, 4(2), 84-96. doi: 10.63341/2786-491X-2024-2-85.
  17. Lopez, A., & Wang, Y. (2025). Three prominent Yale professors depart for Canadian university, citing Trump fears. Retrieved from https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2025/03/27/three-prominent-yaleprofessors-depart-for-canadian-university-citing-trump-fears/.
  18. Marginson, S. (2024). The new geo-politics of higher education 2: Between nationalism and globalism. Working paper 108Oxford: Centre for Global Higher Education.
  19. Mohamed, T.N. (2025). Beyond borders: Exploring the connection between global identity and academic self-efficacy in college students – a cross-sectional study. Psychology, Society & Education, 17(2), 86-99. doi: 10.21071/pse.v17i2.17890.
  20. Natalina, N.O. (2023). The asynchrony of democratisation as a global trend in the new world order formation. Political Life, 3, 118-125. doi: 10.31558/2519-2949.2023.3.15.
  21. Portnikov, V. (2025). Identity trap: Vitaly Portnikov. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPyl5zBsClc.
  22. Pryadko, T.P., & Ruban, A.O. (2025). The crisis of democracy: Analysis and forecasting in modern scientific discourse. Regional Studies, 41, 161-165. doi: 10.32782/2663-6170/2025.41.26.
  23. Rosanvallon, P. (2021). The trials of life – understanding the French in a different way. Paris: Seuil.
  24. Ryan, C. (2021). Nation-states, empires, wars, hostilities. Ethics & International Affairs, 35(3), 367379. doi: 10.1017/S089267942100040X.
  25. Sánchez-Prieto, J.M. (2023). Culture wars and nationalism. Religions, 14(7), article number 898. doi: 10.3390/rel14070898.
  26. Spengler, O. (2007). The decline of the West. Prague: Albatros.
  27. Stezhko, Z., Hryshchenko, N., Kultenko, V., Savytska, I., Suprun, A., & Rusko, N. (2021). Freedom or arbitrariness: A social and philosophic analysis. Postmodern Openings, 12(2), 354-366. doi: 10.18662/po/12.2/312.
  28. Yablonskyi, V.M., et al. (2019). The policy of historical memory in the context of national security of Ukraine: Analytical report. Kyiv: National Institute for Strategic Studies.
  29. Yermolenko, V., & Ogarkova, T. (2025). Powerlessness of the strong: Why is Europe (still) weak? Retrieved from https://surl.li/fggpjp.
  30. Zizek, S. (2022). Pacifism is the wrong response to the war in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/21/pacificsm-is-the-wrong-response-to-the-war-inukraine.