Professional motivation of future agrobiologists as a pedagogical issue

Oksana Prytyka
Abstract

The study substantiated the relevance of researching the professional motivation of future agrobiologists in the context of contemporary environmental, economic, and social challenges, which significantly influence the quality of specialist training in the agricultural sector. This article aimed to examine the pedagogical factors affecting the development of professional motivation among agrobiology students to enhance their professional training. To achieve this aim, causal analysis and surveys were employed, ensuring a comprehensive approach to studying the issue. The findings indicated that professional motivation is a complex socio-psychological construct that determines the quality of professional development among future specialists. Key factors influencing students’ motivational sphere were identified, including an awareness of the significance of their chosen profession, the organisation of educational and cognitive activities, engagement in practical work, the creation of a positive learning environment, and lecturer support. The study established that both internal and external factors significantly influence the formation of motivation. Internal factors include students’ awareness of the significance of their chosen profession, interest in the field of study, and aspiration for professional development. External factors encompass the organisation of the educational process, the creation of a positive learning environment within the institution, engagement in practical activities, and lecturer support. The study analysed the characteristics of fostering sustained motivation for professional training, which facilitates the development of students’ personal potential and enhances independence, creativity, and self-improvement skills. Such motivation increases their readiness to tackle complex professional challenges, improves the efficiency of the educational process, and contributes to the advancement of agricultural education as a whole. The practical significance of the study’s findings lies in their potential application within the educational programmes of higher agricultural institutions and their use in developing pedagogical models aimed at fostering motivation for professional activity

Keywords

socio-psychological process; professional training; specialist preparation; education

Suggested citation
Prytyka, O. (2025). Professional motivation of future agrobiologists as a pedagogical issue. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 13(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/1.2025.24
References

[1] Carroll, N.J., Buckmaster, D., & Knobloch, N.A. (2011). What motivates agricultural students? In Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference & exposition (paper number 11-10978). Louisville: ASABE. doi: 10.13031/2013.37382.

[2] CEDOS. (2016). Socio-economic portrait of students: Survey results. Retrieved from https://cedos.org.ua/researches/sotsialno-ekonomichnyi-portret-studentiv-rezultaty-opytuvannia.

[3] Institute of Educational Analytics of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2023). Ethical code of the scientist of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://iea.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/sode-of-ethics_ssi-iea.pdf.

[4] Jaklová Dytrtová, J., Jakl, M., & Tlustoš, P. (2008). The efficiency of activity-aided teaching using an e-learning program in Agrochemistry as a bachelor degree subjectJournal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 1(2), 1-11.

[5] Korneschuk, V.V., & Fedirchyk, T.D. (2018). Professional training of specialists in higher education institutions: Textbook. Odesa: PE M.O. Bondarenko.

[6] Kupchak, M., & Samilo, A. (2020). Professional motivation as an internal factor in the development of professionalism of the future manager. Bulletin of Lviv State University of Life Safety, 21, 107-112. doi: 10.32447/20784643.21.2020.13.

[7] Kurbatova, A.O. (2021). Personal factors of professional motivation for students with disabilities. Bulletin of Postgraduate Education. Series: Social and Behavioural Sciences, 18(47), 79-100. doi: 10.32405/2522-9931-2021-18(47)-79-100.

[8] Lakatosh, M.O. (2021). Professional training of future specialists in the agricultural sector in higher education institutions of Ukraine. (Doctoral dissertation, Mukachevo State University, Mukachevo, Ukraine).

[9] Law of Ukraine No. 1556-VII “On Higher Education”. (2014, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18.

[10] Lviv National Environmental University. (2019). Survey results of education applicants in the educational program 072 “Finance, Banking, and Insurance”. Retrieved from https://surl.li/wbvyji.

[11] Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. doi: 10.1037/h0054346.

[12] Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2023). Results of the international study of the quality of education PISA-2022. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/news/rezultati-mizhnarodnogodoslidzhennya-yakosti-osviti-pisa-2022.

[13] National Doctrine of Education Development. (2002, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/347/2002#Text.

[14] National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”. (2023). Satisfaction with training and perception of the profession of students of the Educational and Scientific Institute of Power, Electronics and Electromechanics of NTU “KhPI”. Retrieved from https://web.kpi.kharkov.ua/eee/wp-content/uploads/sites/196/2024/02/stat_zvit_EEE.pdf.

[15] Onipko, V., & Yaprynets, T. (2024). Formation of readiness for innovative educational activities as a key competence of future specialists. Ukrainian Professional Education, 8(2), 71-78. doi: 10.33989/2519-8254.2024.16.314307.

[16] Parrella, J.A., Esquivel, C., Leggette, H.R., & Murphrey, T.P. (2023). Preparing agricultural leaders: An assessment of agricultural students’ perceived importance and development of employability skills. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 30(2), 233-255. doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2023.2179086.

[17] Pavlova, O.G. (2018). Professional motivation as a pedagogical issue. Problems of EngineerPedagogical Education, 61, 121-128. doi: 10.32820/2074-8922-2018-61-121-128.

[18] Rymešová, P., & Kolman, L. (2010). A reflection on university studies and further career development of chosen CULS faculties’ graduatesJournal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 3(2), 42-53.

[19] Siebert, J., Litzenberg, K., Gallagher, R., Wilson, C., Dooley, F., & Wysocki, A.I. (2006). Factors associated with students’ academic motivation in agricultural economics classes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(3), 750-762. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00893.x.

[20] Sternberg, R.J. (2019). A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(4), article number 23. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7040023.

[21] Stryzhak, Yu., & Grynova, M. (2022). Formation of self-regulatory competence of future teachers of foreign languages in the process of professional training. Pedagogical Sciences, 5(1), 48-53. doi: 10.33989/2524-2474.2022.79.264538.

[22] Tiwen, H. (2023). Methods and means of developing academic talent of students in universities of the PRC. Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies, 9(2), 228-245. doi: 10.31470/2415-3729-2023-18-228-245.

[23] Tkachenko, O.V. (2018). Professional and pedagogical training of agronomist-researchers at agricultural universities. (Abstract of the Dissertation for the degree of PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, Institute of Pedagogical and Adult Education of NAES of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine).

[24] Zatkova, T. (2020). Final theses from higher education pedagogy course at Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra as reflection of the quality of the education at the level of its subjectsR&ESource, 18, 126-133.