The relevance of the subject matter is conditioned by the problem of the crisis of national Ukrainian identity against the background of Russian military aggression, which is a strategic threat to the country, which has been fighting for its independence and territorial integrity for years. The purpose of the study was to investigate the possibilities and means of influencing cultural policy on the process of developing the national identity of Ukrainians. To achieve this goal, the following procedures were applied: analytical and synthetic research, phenomenological, dialectical, cultural, descriptive, and causal methods that reveal the content of cultural policy and identify influences on the processes of national identification. The basis of the research was the thesis that culture, being a phenomenon of the living world, is simultaneously an instrument of politics, a means of communication, and a tool for manipulating consciousness. In the course of the research, it was found that non-violent and non-aggressive means of cultural policy are more effective for the processes of self-identification and development of national identity, intercultural communication, compared to conventional mechanisms of influence, which are often ineffective in modern conditions of postnon-classical society with its uncertainty, transnational ties, hybrid wars, etc. Aesthetic and emotional perception, typical of culture and art, appeals to the ideas of cultural unity, the heredity of cultural traditions, common markers of memory as a basis for understanding complex issues of socio-political existence. It precedes a rationally substantiated awareness of reality, providing at the aesthetic level the development of pre-conceptual impressions through emotions, irrational manifestations. Detached values of the aesthetic acquire the ability to influence reality, containing a perfect image of proper existence, reflect the socio-cultural matrix of the present, and provide stable mechanisms for identifying the individual and social development, objectified in political programmes, ethical principles, worldview ideas, creative acts, etc. The results of the study can be used by state and local authorities, public organisations for strategic planning and correction of cultural policy, cultural diplomacy, etc.
culture; socio-cultural transformations; identity threats; cross-cultural communication; cultural diplomacy
[1] Ashmore, R.D., Jussim, L.J., & Wilder, D. (2001). Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[2] Bogado, N., Bytzek, E., & Steffens, M.C. (2023). Framing the inclusiveness of the national ingroup: Do identity-related frames affect national identity representations salience? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 92, article number 101744. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.101744.
[3] Cherepovska, N. (2022). Media psychological features of youth patriotism in the information age. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 27(2), 188-200. doi: 10.61727/sssppj/2.2021.188.
[4] Dollinger, S. (2015). National dictionaries and cultural identity: Insights from Austrian, German, and Canadian English. In P. Durkin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lexicography (pp. 590-604). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199691630.013.42.
[5] Encyclopaedia of Modern Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://esu.com.ua/.
[6] Hrytsak, Ya. (2024). History of Ukraine. Lecture 2. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCFxz7AUb7o.
[7] Hundorova, T. (2024). Paris or Patsykiv? How Yuriy Shevelyov destroyed the “Carthage of Ukrainian provinciality” in the centre of Europe. Retrieved from https://surl.li/jdnnmn.
[8] Huntington, S.P. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Delhi: Penguin Books India.
[9] Kanarsky, A.S. (2008). Dialectics of the aesthetic process. Kyiv: Myronivska Typography.
[10] Kaplan, Y.R., Sheafer, T., & Shenhav, S.R. (2022). Do we have something in common? Understanding national identities through a metanarrative analysis. Nations and Nationalism, 28(4), 1152-1172. doi: 10.1111/nana.12872.
[11] Kovács, K. (2022). Constitutional or ethnocultural? National identity as a European legal concept. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 8(1), 170-190. doi: 10.17356/ieejsp.v8i1.713.
[12] Kult: Podcast. (2021). Freedom and slavery. Retrieved from https://soundcloud.com/kultpodcast/svoboda.
[13] Kundera, M. (2023). A kidnapped West: The tragedy of Central Europe. London: Faber & Faber.
[14] Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.
[15] Marukhovska-Kartunova, O., Turenko, V., Zarutska, O., Spivak, L., Vynnychuk, R., & Vynnychuk, R. (2025). Exploring contemporary socio-cultural shifts in Ukraine and their effects on strengthening national identity and resilience in times of war. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología – Serie de Conferencias, 4, article number 1288. doi: 10.56294/sctconf20251288.
[16] Melnyk, I.V. (2022). Mechanisms of state cultural policy formation: Foreign experience. Mechanisms of Public Administration. Scholarly Notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Public Administration, 33(72)(2), 65-69. doi: 10.32838/TNU-2663-6468/2022.2/11.
[17] Melnyk, Yu.P. (2023). Integrative models of adaptation of the EU cultural policy development strategy in Ukrainian culture. Current Problems of Philosophy and Sociology, 42, 156-162. doi: 10.32782/apfs.v042.2023.26.
[18] Meteliova, T.O. (2017). The policy of a common European identity: The possibilities of using of European Union’s experience by Ukraine. Socio-Political Processes, 2-3(6-7), 215-238.
[19] Pettai, V. (2021). National identity and re-identity in post-Soviet Estonia. Journal of Baltic Studies, 52(3), 425-436. doi: 10.1080/01629778.2021.1944236.
[20] Shevelov, Yu. (1949). Thoughts against the current. Kyiv: Publishing house “Ukraine”.
[21] Shtohrin, I. (2017). Imadeddin Raef and Maryna Hrymych about “Beirut Stories” by Ahatanhel Krymsky. Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/video/28389270.html.
[22] Spiegler, O., Christ, O., & Verkuyten, M. (2022). National identity exploration attenuates the identification-prejudice link. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(4), 902-923. doi: 10.1177/1368430221990093.
[23] The EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026. (2022, December). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022G1207(01).
[24] Urys, T., Kozak, T., & Barabash, S. (2021). National identity: Formation and realisation through poetry. Wisdom, 17(1), 146-161. doi: 10.24234/wisdom.v17i1.449.
[25] Zabuzhko, O. (2009). Shevchenko’s myth of Ukraine: An attempt at philosophical analysis. Kyiv: Fact.
[26] Zabuzhko, O. (2024). And again, about information warfare. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/share/p/bVKthcqispiwhL13/.
[27] Zdioruk, S.I. (2020). Ukraine on the way of integration to the European Community. Politology Bulletin, 84, 170-191. doi: 10.17721–2415-881x. 2020.84. 170-191.
[28] Zdioruk, S.I., Lytvynenko, O.M., & Rozumna, O.P. (2012). Cultural policy of Ukraine: National model in the European context. Kyiv: Fenix.