Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy

The formation of personality leadership qualities in higher educational institutions

S. Khrystiuk
Download article
Abstract

The current study is aimed at analyzing modern problematicity of forming personality leadership qualities in higher educational institutions within Ukraine; considering personality leadership qualities as a direct contact between the leader and followers, the multi-role educational leadership, the presence of leadership qualities both in heads of higher educational institutions and other participants (teachers and lecturers), the ability to educate leaders; perceiving leadership essence, fundamental transformations experienced by modern higher educational institutions and their leaders, main reasons for modern leaders’ failures in the light of new civilizational paradigm, the mental model influence on behavior and its relationship with the outside world. For this purpose, the formation of a new work culture at the university, in which absolutely all links, all education participants are interested in improving the quality of higher education has been examined. It has highlighted that Ukraine has a fairly high level of higher education in accordance with the world indices and rankings in terms of higher education quality. The study states that a modern leader is a person who thinks in global categories, assumes potential opportunities, demonstrates the latest technology knowledge, encourages constructive challenge, contributes to the development of individuals’ abilities, delegates authority to them, develops a team work approach, demonstrates personal achievements, a high level of competence, acts flexibly regarding the required situation, in accordance with the proclaimed values and mission. Thus, in terms of unstable socio-economic and political reality, leadership is considered as a model for managing a higher educational institution effectively

Keywords

leader, leadership qualities, personality leadership qualities, higher educational institutions, educational institution efficiency

Suggested citation
Khrystiuk, S. (2022). The formation of personality leadership qualities in higher educational institutions. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 10(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog13(1).2022.81-88
References

1. Bondarchuk О. І., Nezhynska, О. О. (2017). Liderstvo u diialnosti kerivnyka osvitnoi orhanizatsii [Leadership in the activities of the head of an educational organization]. Spetskurs dlia slukhachiv ochno-dystantsiinoi formy navchannia v systemi pisliadyplomnoi pedahohichnoi osvity [Special course for full-time and distance learning students in the system of postgraduate pedagogical education]. Кyiv. 36 p.

2. Nestulia, О. О., Nestulia, S. І., Kononets, N. V. (2018). Osnovy liderstva [Leadership Fundamentals]. Elektronnyi posibnyk dlia samostiinoi roboty studentiv [Electronic manual for individual work of students]. Poltava. 241 p.

3. Osvitnie liderstvo: vid teorii do praktyky [Educational leadership: from theory to practice] (2021). Kolektyvna monohrafiia za naukovoiu redaktsiieiu Miliaieva, V. R. [Collective monograph edited by V. R. Miliaieva]. Kyiv – Kryvyi Rih. 296 p. URL: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/3665 9

4. Stavytskyi, А. (2016). Rol vykladacha-lidera u suchasnomu universyteti [The role of a teacher-leader in a modern university]. Navchalnyi posibnyk [Manual]. Kyiv. 40 p.

5. Stratehiia rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini na 2021 – 2031 roky [Strategy for the Development of Higher Education in Ukraine for 2021–2031] (2020). Kyiv: Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. 71 p. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/riz ne/2020/09/25/rozvitku-vishchoi-osviti-vukraini-02-10-2020.pdf

6. Adair, J. (2018). Actioncentered leadership. URL: https://www.businessballs.com/leadership -models/action-centred-leadership-johnadair/

7. Daft, R. L. (2017). The leadership experience. Boston, MA, USA: Cengage Learning. 508 p.

8. Hallinger, P., Heck, R. (1998). Exploring the Principal’s Contribution to School Effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Vol. 9. No. 2. pp. 157–191.

9. Hamilton, M. L. (1995). Effects of the Culture in Two Schools on the Process and Outcomes of Staff Development. The Elementary School Journal. Vol. 95. No. 4. pp. 36–-385. 10. Harris, A. (2003). Teacher Leadership as Distributed Leadership: Heresy, Fantasy or Possibility. School Leadership and Management. Vol. 23. No. 3. pp. 313–324.

11. Leithwood, K. Jantzi, D., Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing Leadership for Changing Times. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

12. Khrystiuk, S. B. (2021). The essence and significance of benchmarking in strategic planning in higher education institutions. Humanitarian studios: pedagogics, psychology, philosophy. Vol. 12(4). pp. 61–67.

13. Killingley, P. (2019). Ukraine Higher Education Leadership Development Programme: Impact Report. URL: https://ihed.org.ua/wpcontent/uploads/2019/11/LDP__ImpactReport_BC_eng.pdf

14. Kuczmarski, S., Kuczmarski, Th. (1995). Values-Based Leadership. New York: Englewood Cliffs.

15. Mc Gregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New-York: Toronto.

16. QS Higher Education System Strength Rankings (2020). URL: https://www.topuniversities.com/systemstrength-rankings/

17. Robinson, V. (2007). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: Making sense of the evidence.URL: https://research.acer.edu.au/research_co nference_2007/5

18. Shelestova, L., Kostyria, I., Fedyaeva, V., Brychоk, S., Bohomolova, M., Tomashevska, I. (2020). Formation of the Leadership Position of Professionals in Higher Education Institutions. Postmodern Openings, 11(2 Supl. 145–160. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2Sup1/184

19. The Good Country Index (2020). URL: https://www.goodcountry.org/index/results /