The essence of the concept «Bioethical views of future veterinary students»

Vasyl Marusiak
Abstract

The article analyzes the key concepts of the study, including «bioethics», «bioethical principles», «bioethical rules», and «bioethical views of future veterinary students». Despite the fact that the concept of «bioethics» was introduced into scientific discourse as early as 1971, it is still insufficiently covered in domestic scientific literature. The analysis and interpretation of this concept allow it to be defined as a science that studies the moral foundations of human coexistence with all living beings, including animals. The study identifies the main bioethical principles in the context of the researched problem, such as: life as the highest value; love and care for all forms of life; justice; autonomy; responsibility towards nature; and humane treatment of animals. The article highlights the basic rules that a bioethical personality should follow (according to G. Hubenko), namely: 1) I recognize the need for urgent action in a world that is in crisis; 2) I accept the fact that the future survival and development of humanity largely depend on today's plans and actions; 3) I acknowledge the uniqueness of each individual; 4) I accept the inevitability of some human suffering; 5) I affirm my reverence for life. The analysis and generalization of the research results make it possible to define the concept of «Bioethical views of future veterinary students» as a system of knowledge about bioethical principles, rules, and values formed in students during their professional training, which expresses their attitude towards all living beings and will be implemented in future practice to resolve ethical dilemmas related to animal life and health

Keywords

bioethics, bioethical views, future veterinarians, bioethical values, bioethical norms, bioethical principles

Suggested citation
Marusiak, V. (2024). The essence of the concept «Bioethical views of future veterinary students». Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(2), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(2).2024.65-72
References

[1] Di Bernardo, G. (2001). Bioethics: Philosophical justification. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 11, 33-38.

[2] Bilousova, T. (2019). Lexicographic ordering of bioethical terminology. Scientific works of the Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University. Philological Sciences, 49, 76-78.

[3] Galkin, O.Yu., & Hryhorenko, A.A. (2011). Bioethics in Ukraine: From theory to practice. Regulatory, legal and educational and scientific aspects. Journal “KPI Science News”, 3, 12-19.

[4] Rassudina, K. (2021). Bioethical concept of quality of life: Critical analysis. Scientific Notes of NaUKMA. Philosophy and Religious Studies, 7, 71-77.

[5] Potter, V.R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Hoboken: Prentice Hall.

[6] Kundiyev, Yu., Dembnovetzky, O., Chashchin, M., & Rudy, R. (2002). Bioethics ‒ new level of integration of sciences and humanities. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 11, 11-17.

[7] Kundiyev, Yu. (2004). Bioethics. Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine, 3, article number 35291.

[8] Pustovit, S. (2009). Global bioethics: Formation of theory and practice (philosophical analysis). Kyiv: Arctur-A.

[9] Vynnyk-Ostapyshyn, V. (2015). Bioethics as a way to harmonious coexistence of human and nature. Herald of Precarpathian University. Philosophical and Psychological Sciences, 19, 59-65.

[10] Hrynyova, M. (2016). Bioethics as an understanding of the phenomenon of life. The Image of a Modern Teacher, 5, 5-8.

[11] Hubenko, H. (2014). The role of bioethics & noospheric class in solution of modern moral crisis of civilization. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University, “Philosophy” Series, 16, 122-127.

[12] Sinyavsky, V.V., & Sergeenkova, O.P. (2007). Psychological dictionary. Kyiv: Naukoviy Svit.