Suprun, S.
(2024).
New ethics as a response to globalization.
Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy,
12(1),
172-179.
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(1).2024.172-179
Relevance. In today's geopolitical space, the most pressing issue is the national security of individual states in the context of various forms of geopolitical expansion. Ukraine is at the epicenter of these extremely difficult conditions. The national security of our country is under threat. Socio-political forecasts and globalization processes point to the reformatting of the consciousness of not only a single nation, but the entire world society. The cultures of peoples all over the Earth are strongly influenced by globalization processes. The purpose of the article is to analyze the expected and unexpected changes that we will receive as a result of this large-scale and multidimensional process. especially the emergence of a new ethics as a reaction to globalization. Therefore, the main tasks are to determine possible interpretations of globalization processes in the context of geopolitical expansion, the main manipulative components: politics, economics, mass culture, mass media; analysis of the consequent phenomena, such as deformed consciousness of individuals and society as a whole, crisis of understanding oneself in the globalized world, risks of losing identity. The study found that we associate the emergence of new narratives, norms, and prescriptions with the emergence of a new ethic that will become the main regulator within civilized globalization. In conclusion, it can be argued that the most important problem remains the place of man and his interconnections in the world of total globalization
geopolitical space, globalization processes, ethics, civilized globalization
1. Atkinson, A. (2002). Globalisation and the European welfare state at the opening and the closing of the twentieth century. In H. Kierzkowski (Ed.). Europe and globalisation (pp. 249-273). New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
2. Berger, S. (2002). Globalisation and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 43-62.
3. Bergh, A., & Nilsson, T. (2010). Do liberalization and globalisation increase income inequality? European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 488-505.
4. Litvinova, I., Ivanov, A., Suprun, A., Nitchenko, A., & Stets, O. (2021). Impact of the pandemic on the personal freedom limitation (personal freedom includes freedom of mobility). Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 11(2), 40-44.
5. Neal, G. A. (1998). National trauma and collective memory: Major events in the American century. New York, London: M.E. Sharpe.
6. Stezhko, Z., Hryshchenko, N., & Suprun, A. (2021). Freedom or arbitrariness: A social and philosophic analysis. Postmodern Openings, 12(2), 354-366.
7. Storozhuk, S.V., Goyan, I.M., & Fedyk, O.V. (2018). The role of collective memory in the process of formation of national unity: The Ukrainian dimension. Humanitarian Journal, 1, 11-22.
8. Suchy, O. (2014). The problem of collective trauma in Ukrainian society and the search for strategies to overcome it. Scientific Notes of the Institute of Political and Ethnonational Studies named after I. F. Kuras NAS of Ukraine, 6(74), 18-32.