Exploring the nature of consciousness: Michael Grazino's attention scheme theory and Bernard Baars' global workspace theory

Kostyantyn Derid, Vira Dodonova
Abstract

The article examines the modern discourse on the problem of consciousness in the context of theories about the biological and physical basis of consciousness. In order to consider problematic issues of consciousness, two theoretical approaches to consciousness are analyzed: Michael Graziano's attention schema theory and Bernard Baars' global workspace theory. By describing the key characteristics of each approach, we determine what aspects of consciousness they propose to explain, what their neurobiological commitments are, and what empirical evidence is cited to support them. Researching the theories of Michael Graziano and Bernard Baars helps in understanding how the brain creates conscious experience, which is key to progress in the field of cognitive science and neuroscience. Understanding the nature of consciousness is important for philosophical and ethical discussions related to questions of responsibility, self-awareness, and other aspects of social existence. Research also promotes interaction between different fields of science, such as neurobiology, psychology, philosophy and computer science, which creates an integrated approach to the study of consciousness. In writing this article, the following methods were used: discourse analysis, in order to obtain substantiated information about the theories of consciousness of Michael Graziano and Bernard Baars, about various aspects of theories of consciousness, their main principles and interaction with other theories. Comparativist approach: a comparative analysis of the theories of Michael Graziano and Bernard Baars was carried out, highlighting their common and distinctive features. Comprehensive approach: a wide range of knowledge and information was used in writing the article to provide a comprehensive and objective overview of theories of consciousness

Keywords

Michael Graziano's attentional schema theory, consciousness, neurobiology, neural systems, brain, attention, attentional selectivity, information selection, prediction ability, Bernard Baars' global workspace theory, cognitive theory of consciousness, space, platform, global workspace, brain modules, modularity

Suggested citation
Derid, K., & Dodonova, V. (2023). Exploring the nature of consciousness: Michael Grazino's attention scheme theory and Bernard Baars' global workspace theory. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 11(3), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog14(3).2023.212-220
References

1. Rod Caird, Ape Man ISBN 978-0-85766-478-5 Chapter 3, “Thinking”

2. Dawkins R. The Selfish Gene. London: Folio Society; 2019.

3. Are We Really Conscious? (10 October 2014) – Michael Graziano – The New York Times

4. Saxe, R; Wexler, A (2005). "Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction". Neuropsychologia. 43 (10): 1391–1399

5. Baars BJ. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2000.

6. Bernard J. Baars, "Understanding Subjectivity: Global Workspace Theory and the Resurrection of the Observing Self" Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, No. 3, 1996,

7. Graziano MSA Webb TW. The attention schema theory: a mechanistic account of subjective awareness. Frontiers in psychology. 2015:500-500. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00500

8. Daniel C. Dennett, "The Evolution of Consciousness," Consciousness and Emotion in Cognitive Science: Conceptual and Empirical Issues (1998) ed. Josefa Toribio & Andy Clark