Psychological resources of professional growth among lecturers in socionomic specialties in the context of the development of their subjectivity

Oksana Serhieienkova
Abstract

The article addressed the important issue of how lecturers develop their professional position. Professional growth in these specialties occurs under conditions of high emotional strain and intensive interpersonal interaction. This increases the demands placed on self-regulation and responsibility for the psychological climate of the educational environment. This intensifies the risk of chronic stress and burnout, thereby reducing teaching quality and professional resilience. However, the transformation of psychological resources into professional growth and the role of lecturer subjectivity in this process remain insufficiently clarified. This study aimed to identify the psychological resources that facilitate professional development among lecturers in socionomic disciplines and to develop a model for their implementation within the context of subjectivity development. The study showed that emotional factors and socio-emotional competencies form the basis of psychological stability in interactions, while resilience and self-efficacy sustain endurance, recovery and professional motivation. Psychological capital and mindfulness enhance positive self-regulation and reduce reactivity. The study established that the primary mechanism through which resources are transformed into professional growth is lecturer subjectivity, realised through the proactive organisation of professional activity, maintenance of professional identity and engagement, and satisfaction of basic psychological needs. The quality of the lecturer-student relationship is emphasised as a specific socionomic resource that modifies the effectiveness of psychological resources through trust and emotional safety. It has been observed that lecturers’ psychological resources constitute an integrated system, with subjectivity serving as the primary mechanism for professional development by combining resilience, proactivity, and the creation of meaning within the professional role. Practical approaches that develop subjectivity and self-regulation have the potential to enhance well-being, reduce burnout risk, and improve the quality of the educational environment. The results obtained may contribute to the development of effective programmes for teachers’ professional development

Keywords

education; well-being; burnout; self-efficacy; psychological capital

Suggested citation
Serhieienkova, O. (2026). Psychological resources of professional growth among lecturers in socionomic specialties in the context of the development of their subjectivity. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 14(2), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/2.2026.118
References
  1. Agyapong, B., Brett-MacLean, P., Burback, L., Agyapong, V.I.O., & Wei, Y. (2023). Interventions to reduce stress and burnout among teachers: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(9), article number 5625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095625.
  2. Cho, I.-K., Lee, J., Kim, K., Lee, J., Lee, S., Yoo, S., Suh, S., & Chung, S. (2021). Schoolteachers’ resilience does but self-efficacy does not mediate the influence of stress and anxiety due to the COVID-19 pandemic on depression and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, article number 756195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.756195.
  3. Ciuhan, G.C., Nicolau, R.G., & Iliescu, D. (2022). Perceived stress and wellbeing in Romanian teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The intervening effects of job crafting and problem-focused coping. Psychology in the Schools, 59(9), 1844-1855. doi: 10.1002/pits.22728.
  4. de Carvalho, J.S., et al. (2021). Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention for teachers: A study on teacher and student outcomes. Mindfulness, 12, 1719-1732. doi: 10.1007/s12671-021-01635-3.
  5. Gilar-Corbi, R., Izquierdo, A., & Castejón, J.L. (2025). Emotional factors in the psychological well-being of future teachers: A structural model. Journal of Intelligence, 13(6), article number 70. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13060070.
  6. Gracia, E.P., Rodríguez, R.S., Pedrajas, A.P., & Carpio, A.J. (2021). Teachers’ professional identity: Validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Heliyon, 7(9), article number e08049. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08049.
  7. Jiang, Y., & Yuan, Q. (2025). How job satisfaction affects teachers’ occupational burnout: The mediating role of psychological capital moderated by physical exercise. Acta Psychologica, 260, article number 105594. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105594.
  8. Kim, L.E., Fields, D., & Asbury, K. (2023). “It feels like I’m back to being a teacher”: A longitudinal trajectory analysis of teachers’ experiences during the first 8 months of COVID-19 in England. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 1105-1122. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12622.
  9. Kwon, S., Kim, W., Bae, C., Cho, M., Lee, S., & Dreamson, N. (2021). The identity changes in online learning and teaching: Instructors, learners, and learning management systems. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, article number 67. doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00304-8.
  10. Lee, C., & Chae, S.E. (2025). Enhancing teacher well-being through cognitive behavioral theory and visual imagery-based writing with the resulting tower model. Scientific Reports, 15, article number 2081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80997-9.
  11. Lin, Y., Ameyaw, M.A., Zhang, Q., Sun, B., & Li, W. (2022). The relationship between teacher professional identity and burnout amid the pandemic: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, article number 956243. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.956243.
  12. Lokhvis, O. (2022). Psychological characteristics of self-regulatory behavior of future teachers in the process of professional development. Journal of Psychological Perspectives, 39, 257-269. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-log.
  13. Nwoko, J.C., Emeto, T.I., Malau-Aduli, A.E.O., & Malau-Aduli, B.S. (2023). A systematic review of the factors that influence teachers’ occupational wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(12), article number 6070. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126070.
  14. Rubio-Valdivia, J.M., Granero-Gallegos, A., Carrasco-Poyatos, M., & López-García, G.D. (2024). The mediating role of teacher efficacy between academic self-concept and teacher identity among pre-service physical education teachers: Is there a gender difference? Behavioral Sciences, 14(11), article number 1053. doi: 10.3390/bs14111053.
  15. Sohail, M.M., Baghdady, A., Choi, J., Huynh, H.V., Whetten, K., & Proeschold-Bell, R.J. (2023). Factors influencing teacher wellbeing and burnout in schools: A scoping review. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 76(4), 1317-1331. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220234.
  16. Villalta-Paucar, M., Rebolledo-Etchepare, J., & Hernández-Ramos, J.P. (2025). Relationship between well-being and inclusive practice in Chilean teachers: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 13(12), article number 152. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13120152.
  17. Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). The interrelationship between emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and burnout among foreign language teachers: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, article number 913638. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913638.
  18. Xue, D., Sun, B., Li, W., Zhou, H., Ding, F., & Xiao, W. (2023). The symptom network structure of teachers’ burnout and its connection to psychological capital. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 3503-3518. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S421932.
  19. Yaremchuk, N., Pinchuk, N., Kalahurka, K., & Turko, B. (2024). Formation of professional identity of future teachers under conditions of a digital educational environment. Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society, 12, 229-249. doi: 10.32999/2663-970X/2024-12-8.
  20. Zhai, Y., Xiao, W., Sun, C., Sun, B., & Yue, G. (2025). Professional identity makes more work well-being among in-service teachers: Mediating roles of job crafting and work engagement. Psychological Reports, 128(4), 2983-3000. doi: 10.1177/00332941231189217.
  21. Zhang, S., & Luo, Y. (2023). Review on the conceptual framework of teacher resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, article number 1179984. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1179984.