Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy

Axiological measurements of the educational potential of value-oriented disciplines in higher education

Valentyna Kuryliak
Download article
Abstract

The study addressed the educational potential of value-oriented academic disciplines (VOAD) in the context of higher education institutions with religious founders. The study aimed to substantiate the educational potential of value-oriented disciplines in higher education institutions and to determine their role in shaping the moral and civic values of young students. The study revealed the essence of the educational potential of value-oriented disciplines as an integral characteristic of the educational process, which ensures not only the transmission of knowledge, but also the transformation of the student’s worldview based on Christian anthropology and the principle of “human as the image of God”. The study analysed two key dimensions of the realisation of this potential, namely, worldview, which involved the formation of a holistic Christian view of the world in which science and faith were seen as complementary ways of cognition, and professional activity, focused on education through the concept of servant leadership and the principles of professional ethics. The study emphasised the practical significance of such disciplines for improving the quality of life of students, their therapeutic function, and the development of soft skills and emotional intelligence. The study also critically examined the potential risks of implementing this system, in particular the danger of indoctrination and the problem of the so-called greenhouse effect when graduates encounter the realities of secular society. The necessity of balancing value formation and the development of autonomous critical thinking as a condition for the mature personal and professional identity of graduates was substantiated. The proposed approach addressed VOAD as a tool not only for education but also for preparing students for responsible public service in a pluralistic environment. The results of the study can be used in the development and improvement of educational programmes in higher education institutions focused on the integration of the value and academic dimensions of education

Keywords

Christian anthropology; integration of faith and learning; servant leadership; worldview; professional ethics; soft skills

Suggested citation
Kuryliak, V. (2026). Axiological measurements of the educational potential of value-oriented disciplines in higher education. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 14(2), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/2.2026.07
References
  1. Andersen, J. (2018). Servant leadership and transformational leadership: From comparisons to farewells. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(6), 762-774. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-01-2018-0053.
  2. Ashley, G., & Cort, M. (2007). The effects of the practice of the newstart health regimen on faculty stress among faculty at seventh-day adventist colleges and universities. Christian Higher Education, 6(2), 131-142. doi: 10.1080/15363750600712300.
  3. Banks, R.J., Ledbetter, B.M., & Greenhalgh, D.C. (2016). Reviewing leadership: A Christian evaluation of current approaches (2nd ed.). Ada: Baker Academic.
  4. Basnet, N., Luitel, S., & Tamang, S. (2024). Existentialism and its implications for leadership: Examining the existential philosophical perspective in leadership practices. Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(1-2), 44-59. doi: 10.3126/jbmr.v6i1-2.76521.
  5. Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education: Purposes, traditions and prospects. New York: Springer.
  6. Biryuk, L., & Pishun, S. (2022). Axiological approach to the forming professionally capable personality of intending primary school teachers. Current Issues of the Humanities, 56(1), 161-166. doi: 10.24919/2308-4863/56-1-23.
  7. Blanchard, K., & Hodges, P. (2006). Lead like Jesus: Lessons from the greatest leadership role model of all time. Nashville: W Pub Group.
  8. Bryan, S.M. (2023). Cultural identity and the purposes of God: A biblical theology of ethnicity, nationality, and race. Themelios: An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies, 48(3), 727-728.
  9. Canavesi, A., & Minelli, E. (2022). Servant leadership: A systematic literature review and network analysis. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34, 267-289. doi: 10.1007/s10672-021-09381-3.
  10. Connerton, C.S., & Theuri, S. (2023). Newstart: An 8-week faith-based health promotion program to reduce chronic disease risk factors in the US. Journal of Religion and Health, 62, 3175-3187. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01849-w.
  11. Garner, D., de Carvalho, J., & Spears, B. (2025). Emotional intelligence and academic performance among college students: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Education and Human Development, 14, 87-103. doi: 10.15640/jehd.v14p8.
  12. Ghosh, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) and ethical concerns: A review and research agenda. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), article number 2551809. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2551809.
  13. González, A.M. (2024). Research and the Christian identity of universities. Church, Communication and Culture, 9(2), 207-224. doi: 10.1080/23753234.2024.2389277.
  14. Greene, J.A., & Yu, S.B. (2015). Educating critical thinkers: The role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 45-53. doi: 10.1177/2372732215622223.
  15. Gross, J.A. (1988). Teachers on trial: Values, standards & equity in judging conduct and competence. Ithaca: ILR Press.
  16. Hachkevych, A., & Vesolovska, M. (2023). Emotional intelligence cards for the development of employee potential. Management and Entrepreneurship: Trends of Development, 3(25), 115-127. doi: 10.26661/2522-1566/2023-3/25-10.
  17. Hamid, S. (2025). Emotional intelligence in education: A catalyst for effective teaching and learning. Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 5(1), 117-133. doi: 10.58622/vjes.v5i1.218.
  18. Kaliappen, N. (2025). Applying community-engaged service learning to enhance students’ knowledge, civic engagement and social responsibility. AIB Insights, 25(1). doi: 10.46697/001c.127176.
  19. Kaltved, D. (2021). Emotional intelligence and soft skills: What employers are seeking. Retrieved from https://www.sph.umn.edu/news/emotional-intelligence-and-soft-skills/.
  20. Kaplan, J.H. (1989). Values education: A response to moral relativism. ERIC. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315360.
  21. Khodjamkulov, U.N. (2024). The role of the axiological approach in the development of education in modern pedagogy. Web of Teachers: Inderscience Research, 2(12), 278-282.
  22. Klotz, V.K., Billett, S., & Winther, E. (2014). Promoting workforce excellence: Formation and relevance of vocational identity for vocational educational training. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6, article number 6. doi: 10.1186/s40461-014-0006-0.
  23. Kolisnyk-Humeniuk, Yu.I. (2014). Formation of future specialist’s professional ethics. Pedagogic and Psychology of Professional Education: Scientific and Methodological Journal, 5, 215-222.
  24. Krasnoshchok, I.P. (2019). Upbringing potential of institution of higher education: Structure and development criteria. Academic Notes. Series: Pedagogical Science, 180, 90-97.
  25. Kryger, M., & Qvortrup, A. (2025). Conceptualizing and developing vocational identity – a scoping review of research in vocational education and training. Vocations and Learning, 18, article number 15. doi: 10.1007/s12186-025-09371-8.
  26. Lenton, A.P., Bruder, M., Slabu, L., & Sedikides, C. (2013). How does “being real” feel? The experience of state authenticity. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 276-289. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00805.x.
  27. Liessi, H.D., & da Silva Liessi, L.M. (2022). Biblical anthropology: Foundations and teaching models. (Doctoral thesis, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, USA).
  28. Mariskind, C. (2014). Teachers’ care in higher education: Contesting gendered constructions. Gender and Education, 26(3), 306-320. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2014.901736.
  29. Martino, W. (2009). Teachers as role models. In L.J. Saha & A.G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 755-768). Boston: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-73317-3_47.
  30. Mendoza-Urbina, F.J., Gabriel-Tirajaya, J.R., Idrogo-Barboza, G., Montañez-Huancaya, N.N., Cherres-Lopez, Z.E., Gabriel-Tirajaya, G., & Rodríguez-Saavedra, M.O. (2024). Soft skills and emotional intelligence in students of the education program. International Journal of Religion, 5(9), 442-447. doi: 10.61707/znp9ry55.
  31. Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771-781. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2012.745047.
  32. Paridinova, B., Sapartayeva, L., Tungatova, N., Tulepbergenova, A., & Kassymbekova, M. (2023). Future teachers’ spiritual worldview formation factors. Education Research International, 2023, article number 9972903. doi: 10.1155/2023/9972903.
  33. Patterson, K.A. (2003). Servant leadership: A theoretical model. (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University, Virginia Beach, USA).
  34. Prentice, M. (2007). Service learning and civic engagement. Academic Questions, 20(2), 135-145. doi: 10.1007/S12129-007-9005-Y.
  35. Siegel, H. (2017). Education’s epistemology: Rationality, diversity, and critical thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190682675.001.0001.
  36. Tamayo, A.O.E. (2025). Critical thinking and epistemic sophistication in science education. Journal of Intelligence, 13(8), article number 93. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13080093.
  37. Taylor, J.W.V. (2022). Essential elements in the philosophy of adventist education. The Journal of Adventist Education, 84(1), 18-25. doi: 10.55668/ZBSY8715.
  38. Ukrainian Humanitarian Institute. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ugi.edu.ua/.
  39. UNODC. (2016). Professional ethics. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/e4j/IntegrityEthics/E4J_Integrity_and_Ethics_Module_14_final_UKR.pdf.
  40. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178. doi: 10.2307/1170301.