Oliinyk, I.
(2023).
Essential features and reasons for scaling the phenomenon of precarious practice.
Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy,
11(2),
188-198.
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog14(2).2023.188-198
The article reveals the essence of precarity as a social phenomenon and substantiates the reasons for the spread of this phenomenon. The classical approach based on the relationship between the emergence of precarity and economic and social transformations, globalization, crisis phenomena and unexpected challenges of modern society is considered. As part of the precarity study, the concept of habitus by P. Bourdieu is reinterpreted, which is understood as a socio-economic position regarding work as one of the lifestyle aspects. The idea of "precarious habitus" is substantiated, which not only enables the "normalization" of the precariat in the public consciousness, but also contributes to the change of people's general ideas about work and employment in general
precarious practice, precariat, middle class, income, downward social mobility, precarious habitus
1. Amelicheva, L. P. (2020). Teoretychni ta aksiolohichni zasady pravovoho rehulyuvannya hidnoyi pratsi v suchasnykh umovakh derzhavotvorennya. Vinnytsya, TOV «Tvory» (In Ukrainian)
2. Babenko, S. (2012). Sotsialʹne spryynyattya zhyttyevoho uspikhu: sotsiokulʹturna proektsiya sotsialnykh nerivnostey. V.N. Karazin Bulletin of Kharkiv National University, No. 999, Issue 30: 99- 107. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKhISD_2012_9 99_30_20 (In Ukrainian)
3. Bourdieu, P. (1996). Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts:
4. Bourdieu, P.(1998). Le precarite est aujourd’hui partour (Precariousness is Everywhere Novadays, pp.96–102.) In: Contre-feux. Paris. (In French).
5. Bourdieu, P. (2005). Habitus (p. 43–49). In: J. Hillier (ed.), E. Rooksboy (ed.). Habitus: A Sense of Place. Surrey, England, Burlington, USA: Ashgate.
6. Bourdieu, P. (2007) O simvolicheskoi vlasti. (Transl. from Franch). In: Sociologia socialnogo prostranstva. Moscow-St. Petersburg, Aleteja (In Russian).
7. EU – number of freelancers grows by 24% in 7 years (2016, June, 10). SIA (Staffing Industry Analists). https://www2.staffingindustry.com/eng/Editorial/Daily-News/EU-Number-of-freelancers-grows-by-24-in-7-years-38211
8. Florida,R. (2018) Homo creativus. Yak novyi klas zavoyovuje svit. Кyiv, Nasch format. (In Ukrainian)
9. Harvard University Press.
10. Hornyak, Tim (2020). How Japan switched to flexible working arrangements. Regus. https://cutt.ly/6ymvvLt
11. Hulevych, O. (2010). Transformatsiya zaynyatosti u sferi posluh pid vplyvom rozvytku informatsiynykh tekhnolohiy. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi. № 2: 10-15 (In Ukrainian)
12. Huzar, U. YE., Lutsyk, M. V. (2013). Nestandartni formy zaynyatosti v umovakh rozvytku postindustrialʹnoho suspilʹstva. Sotsialʹno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny. Problemy intehratsiyi Ukrayiny u svitovyy finansovyy prostir. Issue 1 (99): 467-476 (In Ukrainian)
13. Kolot, A. M. (2014). Transformatsiya instituta zanyatosti kak sostavlyayushchaya global'nykh izmeneniy v sotsial'no-trudovoy sfere: fenomen prekarizatsii. Rynok pratsí ta zaynyatíst' naselennya. № 2: 3-6. (In Russian)
14. Kutsay, N. S., Roshkevych, V. F. (2011). Dystantsiyna robota yak innovatsiynyy napryam motyvatsiyi pratsi: perspektyvy vprovadzhennya v Ukrayini. Ekonomichnyy prostir. № 47: 224-231 (In Ukrainian)
15. Morris, J. (2012). Unruly Entrepreneurs: Russian Worker Responses to Insecure Formal Employment. Global Labour Journal. 3(2): 217–236. https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v3i2.1120