Kultenko, V.
(2024).
Phenomena of colonialism and postcolonialism in the context of modern Ukrainian realities.
Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy,
12(4),
104-116.
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/4.2024.104
When Ukrainian researchers assert that Russia’s policy towards Ukraine was colonial, this claim is often questioned by Western scholars. Russian-Ukrainian relations do not neatly fit into such a model. Therefore, the key question of this study was: to what extent is it justified to define Russian Ukrainian relations as colonial, given that Ukraine’s current and future development largely depends on the decolonisation of Ukrainian consciousness? This study aimed to define the concept of “colonialism”, substantiate the thesis given that Ukraine was colonised by Russia, and develope decolonisation practices. To achieve this, the study employed empirical methods alongside theoretical research methods, including analytical, synthetic, phenomenological, and philosophical reflection. Furthermore, interdisciplinary research methods such as case study, commemorative, philosophical, and historical analysis were utilised. At present, Ukraine is experiencing a postcolonial condition, which results from its historical statelessness, dependence on Russia, and a systemic policy of denationalisation imposed by the metropole. This policy has included the enforcement of an inferiority complex, the suppression of claims to Ukraine’s language, culture, and elite, the erosion of national dignity, and assimilation into the dominant imperial identity. While empires collapse under the pressure of objective factors, Russia, as an imperial centre, actively resists these processes – primarily through open military aggression, sabotage, and information warfare, including psychological manipulations. The postcolonial condition of Ukrainian society manifests in a fragmented national self-identification, an unstable value system, disrupted cultural codes, and deep seated psychological crises at the archetypal level of consciousness. This is further reflected in linguistic disputes, religious conflicts, and other socio-cultural tensions. The practical significance of this study lies in its conclusion that overcoming the negative postcolonial consequences is essential for achieving freedom, advancing European integration, strengthening national identity, and promoting humanistic values. The study aimed to liberate Ukrainian consciousness from post imperial manipulative practices
postcolonial practices; ethnocide; linguicide; manipulation of history; sociocultural transformations; historical trauma; national identity
[1] Aheieva, V. (2021). Behind the scenes of the empire. Essays on Ukrainian-Russian cultural relations. Kyiv: Vikhola.
[2] Bazhan, O. (n.d.). Political prisoners. Retrieved from https://surl.li/jwegih.
[3] Bruckner, P. (2012). The tyranny of guilt: An essay on Western masochism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[4] Cervinkova, H. (2012). Postcolonialism, postsocialism and the anthropology of east-central Europe. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 48(2), 155-163. doi: 10.1080/17449855.2012.658246.
[5] Cigliano, G. (2024). The foreign policy of the Russian Federation. Interpretations and the debate. Ricerche di Storia Politica, 3, 267-284. doi: 10.1412/115032.
[6] De Waal, T. (2015). The G-word: The Armenian massacre and the politics of genocide. Foreign Affairs, 94(1), 136-148.
[7] Dontsov, D. (1933-1939). Selected works: In 10 volumes. Volume 6: Political analytics. Drohobych: Vidrodzhennia.
[8] Dontsov, D. (1926). Nationalism. Zhovkva: Drukarnya Ottsiv Vasyliyan.
[9] Drahomanov, M. (1894). Letters to Trans-Dnieper Ukraine. Kolomyia: Narod.
[10] Drahomanov, M. (1909). The lost epoch. Ukrainians under the Muscovite Tsardom: 1654-1876. Lviv: Printing House of Ivan Eichelberger.
[11] Horinov, P., & Drapushko, R. (2022). Formation of the national identity of Ukrainians as the basis of national security of the Ukrainian state. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 10, 26-30. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2022-10/2.
[12] Kamal, A., & Courtheyn, C. (2024). Where is the North? Southern ruptures in decolonizing theory. Political Geography, 108, article number 103029. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.103029.
[13] Kolomiets, R. (2019). Ostap Vyshnya. Kharkiv: Folio.
[14] Krzysztan, B. (2022). Divided memory, postcolonialism and trauma in the South Caucasus. Memory Studies, 15(6), 1307-1311. doi: 10.1177/17506980221135148.
[15] Kubaichuk, V. (2004). Chronology of language events in Ukraine (external history of the Ukrainian language). Kyiv: K.I.S.
[16] Kultenko, V., Morska, N., Fesenko, G., Poperechna, G., Polishchuk, R., & Kulbida, S. (2022). The natural human rights within the postmodern society: A philosophical socio-cultural analysis. Postmodern Openings, 13(1), 186-197. doi: 10.18662/po/13.1/391.
[17] Marukhovska-Kartunova, O., Turenko, V., Zarutska, O., Spivak, L., & Vynnychuk, R. (2025). Exploring contemporary socio-cultural shifts in Ukraine and their effects on strengthening national identity and resilience in times of war. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología – Serie de Conferencias, 4, article number 1288. doi: 10.56294/sctconf20251288.
[18] Moore, D.C. (2001). Is the post- in postcolonial the post- in post-Soviet? Toward a global postcolonial critique. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 116(1), 111-128. doi: 10.1632/S0030812900105073.
[19] Morozova, L., Morozova, O., Drabovska, V., Hrechanovska, O., Martirosian, L., & Benera, V. (2021). Formation of national culture and national consciousness in the postmodern society. Postmodern Openings, 12(1), 257-270. doi: 10.18662/po/12.1Sup1/283.
[20] Mudrakov, V., Hapchenko, O., & Kozachenko, S. (2023). Common sense as identity health: Toward a reflection on the Russian-Ukrainian war. Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, 3(2), 25-32.
[21] Naulko, V.I., & Hryniv, O.I. (2009). Etnotsyd. Retrieved from https://esu.com.ua/article-18074.
[22] Ocheretianko, S., & Ryabets, L. (2024). Ban on the Ukrainian language. Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine. Retrieved from https://esu.com.ua/article-17240.
[23] Olcese, M., Cardinali, P., Madera, F., Camilleri, A.P., & Migliorini, L. (2024). Migration and community resilience: A scoping review. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 98, article number 101924. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101924.
[24] Sosnowska, A. (2019). Socialist postcolonialism: Memory reconsolidation. Acta Poloniae Historica, 119, 344-349.
[25] Stanislavsky, V. (2009). Mazepa Ivan Stepanovych. Retrieved from https://surl.li/ckyucu.
[26] Stezhko, Z., Hryshchenko, N., Kultenko, V., Savytska, I., Suprun, A., & Rusko, N. (2021). Freedom or arbitrariness: A social and philosophic analysis. Postmodern Openings, 12(2), 354-366. doi: 10.18662/po/12.2/312.
[27] Thompson, E.M. (2006). Troubadours of the empire: Russian literature and colonialism. Kyiv: Osnovy.
[28] Velickovic, V. (2012). Belated alliances? Tracing the intersections between postcolonialism and postcommunism. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 48(2), 164-175. doi: 10.1080/17449855.2012.658247.
[29] Veselova, O.M. (n.d.). Ukrainian World Coordination Council (UCC). Retrieved from http://www.history.org.ua/?termin=Ukrainska_Vsesvitnia.
[30] Yan, C.O., & Benhima, M. (2024). The role of legal pluralism in the peacebuilding process. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies, 20(1), 43-71. doi: 10.18848/2324-755X/CGP/v20i01/43-71.
[31] Zabuzhko, O. (2022). The longest journey. Кyiv: Komora.