Педагогічні ризики інтеграції ШІ у систему підготовки військових фахівців: дидактичні та методичні аспекти

Андрій Бестюк, Сергій Похнатюк
Анотація

Метою проведеного дослідження став комплексний теоретичний аналіз дидактичних і методичних загроз, що виникають під час впровадження систем штучного інтелекту у навчальні програми оборонного сектору. Наукове вивчення ґрунтувалося на системному порівнянні стратегічних планів і нормативних актів України, США та Федеративної Республіки Німеччина, що дозволило зіставити підходи до формування нових професійних компетенцій офіцерського корпусу. У ході роботи встановлено, що український освітній простір розвивається за моделлю прискореної адаптації, де впровадження багаторівневої системи офіцерської освіти згідно зі стандартами Організації Північноатлантичного договору та залучення курсів розширеного дистанційного навчання забезпечили життєздатність інституцій у бойових умовах. Виявлено, що у США пріоритет надається концепції швидкої перемоги через гнучкі цикли розробки, тоді як у Німеччині акцент зміщено на ціннісно-орієнтовану інженерію та незалежну валідацію програм. Статистичні дані підтвердили стрімке зростання ринку військового навчання на базі штучного інтелекту, який досягне 2,17 млрд доларів до 2030 року, на тлі збільшення венчурних інвестицій у профільні оборонні стартапи на 24 %. Визначено значення принципу «людини в контурі» управління, що гарантує збереження відповідальності за прийняття рішень у складних тактичних сценаріях. Дані засвідчили, що основною методичною проблемою залишається ефект чорної скриньки, який за умови відсутності пояснюваності алгоритмів знижує рівень довіри особового складу до технічних інструментів. Практичне значення результатів полягає у можливості їх використання навчальними закладами для розробки обов’язкових модулів з інженерії запитів, верифікації даних та етичного аудиту симуляторів

Ключові слова

цифрова грамотність; освітній простір; критичне мислення; фреймворк; гейміфікація

ЦИТУВАТИ
Bestiuk, A., & Pokhnatiuk, S. (2026). Educational risks of AI integration into the training system for military specialists: Didactic and methodological aspects. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 14(2), 88-106. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/2.2026.88
Використані джерела
  1. Agarwala, N. (2023). Robots and artificial intelligence in the military. Obrana a Strategie, 23(2), 83-100. doi: 10.3849/1802-7199.23.2023.02.083-100.
  2. Alzahrani, A. (2022). A systematic review of artificial intelligence in education in the Arab world. Amazonia Investiga, 11(54), 293-305. doi: 10.34069/AI/2022.54.06.28.
  3. Araya, D., & King, M. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence on military defence and security. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
  4. ArmyInform. (2026). NATO experts: Ukraine has made significant progress in professional military education despite the war. Retrieved from https://armyinform.com.ua/en/2026/01/16/nato-experts-ukraine-has-made-significant-progress-in-professional-military-education-despite-the-war.
  5. Bahramnezhad, F., Akbariqomi, M., Arabfard, M., Maher-Sultan, H., & Vahedian-azimi, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in military medicine: A comprehensive review and future directions. Journal of Military Medicine, 27(1), article number 131. doi: 10.30491/jmm.2025.1006856.1321.
  6. Barros Junior, A.J., Santos, R.F., & Batista, W.J. (2025). Military academic-scientific production in times of generative AI: Ethical boundaries and challenges for strategic stability. Journal of Peace, Conflict, and Security Studies, 1(1), 115-132.
  7. Bestyuk, A., & Pokhnatiuk, S. (2025). Integration of artificial intelligence into higher military education as a factor in increasing the efficiency of professional training. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 11(2), 60-71. doi: 10.52534/msu-pp2.2025.60.
  8. Chmyr, V., & Bhinder, N. (2023). AI in the higher military institutions: Challenges and perspectives for military engineering training. Rupkatha Journal, 15, article number 4. doi: 10.21659/rupkatha.v15n4.11.
  9. Clement, S. (2024). NATO and artificial intelligence: Navigating the challenges and opportunities. Luxembourg: Science and Technology Committee.
  10. Combes, W. (2025). Artificial intelligence in professional military education: Patterns for human-AI collaboration. Journal on Baltic Security, 11(2), 1-11. doi: 10.57767/jobs_2025_008.
  11. Enstad, K., & Hagen, A.M. (2026). No common understanding? A scoping review of professional military education in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 70(1), 80-100. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2025.2459408.
  12. EU Artificial Intelligence Act. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/.
  13. European Commission. (n.d.). European approach to artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-approach-artificial-intelligence.
  14. European Defence Agency. (2025). Trustworthiness for AI in defence (TAID). Retrieved from https://eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/brochures/taid-white-paper-final-09052025.pdf.
  15. European Parliament. (2025). Defence and artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2025/769580/EPRS_BRI(2025)769580_EN.pdf.
  16. Gaikwad, M.R., & Choudhary, A.S. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into military education: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Journal of East-West Thought, 15(1), 1317-1330. doi: 10.7492/bgfnbb75.
  17. Gurkovsky, V., Romanenko, Y., & Verbovenko, O. (2024). Innovative approaches in military education in Ukraine: Transforming the educational process during wartime. In Issues trends and perspectives of military science and education development in the context of contemporary global challenges and conflicts (pp. 373-376). Kyiv: Central Research Institute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  18. Hadi, M.A., Abdulredha, M.N., & Hasan, E. (2023). Introduction to ChatGPT: A new revolution of artificial intelligence with machine learning algorithms and cybersecurity. Science Archives, 4(4), article number 276. doi: 10.47587/SA.2023.4406.
  19. Hadlington, L., Binder, J., Gardner, S., Karanika-Murray, M., & Knight, S. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence in a military context: Development of the attitudes toward AI in defense (AAID) scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, article number 1164810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164810.
  20. Hwang, G.J., & Chien, S.Y. (2022). Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, article number 100082. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100082.
  21. ISO/IEC/IEEE 24748-7000:2022. (2022). Systems and software engineering – life cycle management. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/84893.html.
  22. Kania, E.B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in China’s revolution in military affairs. In M. Raska, K. Zysk & I. Bowers (Eds.), Defence innovation and the 4th industrial revolution: Security challenges, emerging technologies, and military implications (pp. 65-92). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003268215.
  23. Kelly, P., & Smith, H. (2024). How to think about integrating generative AI in professional military education. Kyiv: Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  24. Khaleel, M., Jebrel, A., & Shwehdy, D.M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in computer science. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Sustainability, 2(2), 1-21. doi: 10.65998/ijees.v2i2.80.
  25. Lakshmi, A.J., Kumar, A., Kumar, M.S., Patel, S.I., Naik, S.L., & Ramesh, J.V. (2023). Artificial intelligence in steering the digital transformation of collaborative technical education. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 34(2), article number 100467. doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2023.100467.
  26. Libel, T., & Ateş, B. (2025). Academic-military relations in US and allied professional military education organizations, 1991-2024: A comparative analysis and proposed typology. Armed Forces & Society. doi: 10.1177/0095327X251371307.
  27. Makarov, D. (2025). Project-based learning in vocational education: Theory and practice of implementation. In IV international scientific and theoretical conference “Current scientific goals, approaches and challenges” (pp. 246-248). Dresden: Primedia E-launch LLC. doi: 10.36074/scientia-13.06.2025.
  28. Mammadzada, M. (2025). The current state of higher military education in Azerbaijan. Bulletin of Postgraduate Education, 33(62), 292-307. doi: 10.58442/3041-1858-2025-33(62)-292-307.
  29. Markiv, O., Zarivna, O., & Markiv, I. (2024). Scientific and educational priorities for the use of artificial intelligence in the development of Ukrainian military potential. Educational Scientific Space, 6(1), 67-76. doi: 10.31392/ONP.2786-6890.6(1).2024.07.
  30. NATO. (2021). Summary of the NATO artificial intelligence strategy. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2021/10/22/summary-of-the-nato-artificial-intelligence-strategy.
  31. NATO. (2022). Standardization. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/deterrence-and-defence/standardization.
  32. NATO. (2023). Highlights science and technology organization. Retrieved from https://www.sto.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/20240223-uc--sto-highlights-web.pdf.
  33. NATO. (2024a). NATO releases revised AI strategy. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/articles/news/2024/07/10/nato-releases-revised-ai-strategy.
  34. NATO. (2024b). Summary of NATO’s revised artificial intelligence (AI) strategy. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2024/07/10/summary-of-natos-revised-artificial-intelligence-ai-strategy.
  35. NATO. (2025). ADL courses available. Retrieved from https://deepportal.hq.nato.int/eacademy/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/NATO-DEEP-eAcademy-Courses-Catalogue-October-2025.pdf.
  36. Okropiridze, G., & Zaalishvili, L. (2025). Artificial intelligence as a strategic force multiplier in modern defense. In Defence innovations and international partnerships: Shaping the future of security (pp. 56-65). Gori: David Aghmashenebeli National Defence Academy of Georgia.
  37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024). AI principles. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/ai-principles.html.
  38. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Artificial intelligence strategy of the German federal government. Retrieved from https://www.ki-strategie-deutschland.de/files/downloads/Fortschreibung_KI-Strategie_engl.pdf.
  39. Peacock, J.G., Cole, R., Duncan, J., Jensen, B., Snively, B., & Samuel, A. (2025). Transforming military healthcare education and training: AI integration for future readiness. Military Medicine, 190(9-10), 1905-1912. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaf169.
  40. Putra, H., & Mulyono, B.E. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in military education: A double-edged sword. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science and Technology (Nurture), 3(3), 167-174. doi: 10.55927/nurture.v3i3.12366.
  41. Putra, H., Mulyono, B.E., Winarna, A., & Yudho, L. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on the learning motivation of military students. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science and Technology (Nurture), 3(4), 225-232. doi: 10.55927/nurture.v3i4.13714.
  42. Rashid, A.B., Kausik, A.K., al Hassan Sunny, A., & Bappy, M.H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the military: An overview of the capabilities, applications, and challenges. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2023(1), article number 8676366. doi: 10.1155/2023/8676366.
  43. Research and Markets. (2026). Artificial intelligence (AI) in military training research report 2026: $2.17 Bn market opportunities, trends, competitive analysis, strategies, forecasts, 2020-2025, 2025-2030F, 2035F. Retrieved from https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/01/29/3228741/28124/en/Artificial-Intelligence-AI-in-Military-Training-Research-Report-2026-2-17-Bn-Market-Opportunities-Trends-Competitive-Analysis-Strategies-Forecasts-2020-2025-2025-2030F-2035F.html.
  44. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1556-r “On the Approval of the Concept for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Ukraine”. (2021, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-2020-р#Text.
  45. Savina, I., & Shostakivska, N. (2025). Gamification as a tool for developing professional competencies in the context of military education digitalization. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 71(4), 157-166. doi: 10.23856/7118.
  46. Schraagen, J.M. (2023). Responsible use of AI in military systems: Prospects and challenges. Ergonomics, 66(11), 1719-1729. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2278394.
  47. Spirnak, J.R., & Antani, S. (2024). The need for artificial intelligence curriculum in military medical education. Military Medicine, 189(5-6), 954-958. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad412.
  48. Spridzans, M. (2023). Perspectives of developing digital education in military institutions. Society. Integration. Education, 1, 318-328. doi: 10.17770/sie2023vol1.7141.
  49. Spriz, S. (2025). Human in the loop? Retrieved from https://www.hiig.de/en/project/human-in-the-loop/.
  50. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2025). SIPRI yearbook 2025. Retrieved from https://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2025/12.
  51. Topuzov, O.M., & Alekseeva, S.V. (2024). The potential for using artificial intelligence in the educational process at secondary schools under martial law. Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, 1, 5-11.
  52. Tytova, N., & Mereniuk, K. (2022). Digital literacy of future teachers in the realities of large-scale military aggression (Ukrainian experience). Futurity Education, 2(3), 50-61. doi: 10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.33.
  53. U.S. Department of Defense. (2023). Data, analytics, and artificial intelligence adoption strategy. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2023/nov/02/2003333300/-1/-1/1/dod_data_analytics_ai_adoption_strategy.pdf.
  54. U.S. Department of Defense. (2022). 2022 national defense strategy of the United States of America. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF.
  55. U.S. Department of War. (2020). DOD adopts ethical principles for artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2091996/dod-adopts-ethical-principles-for-artificial-intelligence/.
  56. UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence.
  57. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research.